Rent control is further weakened in St. Paul

All buildings opened since 2005 are exempt forever following a City Council vote, and tenants in some older buildings are also facing rent hikes.

The Minnesota Star Tribune
May 8, 2025 at 4:54PM
JIM GEHRZ • jgehrz@startribune.com Minneapolis, MN/January 23, 2007/2:00PM As part of the new Gopher stadium package, lawmakers have mandated that the U of M and the city study the impact on adjacent neighborhoods, which include some single family homes that have been converted to multi-unit dwellings that are rented predominantly by students. The for rent sign is posted in front of a home in the 1400 block of SE 7th St. // housing, houses, neighborhoods, rent, rental, apartme
A sign posted in front of a home in Minneapolis. (Jim Gehrz/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

Landlords who own newer buildings in St. Paul will be free to increase rent as much as they like after a divided City Council voted to permanently exempt all buildings built in 2005 or later from the city’s rent control ordinance.

Mayor Melvin Carter said in a statement after the vote Wednesday that he hoped the exemption, which he had pushed for almost a year, would lead to more affordable apartments long-term.

“Our housing equity goals cannot be achieved without building more homes,” Carter said.

But as he celebrated, council members — even those who voted for the change — said they didn’t think that allowing limitless rent increases would outweigh such factors as inflation and tariffs that continue to push up construction costs.

Interim Ward 4 Council Member Matt Privratsky, who voted for the exemption, said he wanted the city to now focus on changing zoning and permitting processes to speed development.

Undoing rent control alone would not be enough, he said.

“I don’t expect this vote to unlock development overnight,” Privratsky said as he voted.

Joining him in favor of the change were Council President Rebecca Noecker and Members Anika Bowie and Saura Jost.

Council Vice President HwaJeong Kim and Members Cheniqua Johnson and Nelsie Yang opposed the change and were far more skeptical that undoing rent control would spur development.

“To this day, I have not seen the data delivered,” Yang said, adding that she did not think the policy would lead to many new apartments.

But tenants will feel the effect, Kim said. “Renters are again being marginalized,” she said.

Where rent control remains

Rent stabilization was supposed to keep tenants — now only tenants of buildings built in 2004 or earlier — from having their rent raised more than 3% a year. The policy, approved by voters in 2021, was one of the strictest in the nation. Minneapolis voters tackled the issue at the same time, directing the city to investigate rent control, but no policy has been adopted.

In St. Paul, exemptions are common, leaving tenants in older buildings to either swallow rent increases or work through a city appeal process, which can take months.

Wednesday’s vote was never going to affect Peyton Nordby, a 22-year-old who a year ago moved from Fargo into an older brick apartment building on St. Paul’s Ford Parkway. It’s the kind of older building where rent stabilization is supposed keep rents in check, so low-income tenants aren’t pressured to move out.

Nordby lives in a one-bedroom apartment with his two cats, just a few minutes’ walk from his job at a shop in Highland Village.

But this year, his landlord notified him that his rent would increase by 8% in 2026, which will be at least $75 more than the $940 he now pays each month. Maybe even higher, Nordby said, because he got a discounted rate last year.

A 3% increase, the maximum allowed under rent control without an exemption, would have limited the hike to about $28 a month.

“It puts me in a tough spot,” Nordby said. Rent already eats up over half his monthly income.

Worried, and thinking the rent hike was unfair, he went online and figured out how to appeal. He paid a $25 filing fee and got a hearing date.

But Nordby decided not to go to his hearing, which was scheduled for Thursday, the morning after the rent control vote. His landlord had pages and pages of documents showing how her costs had increased, and Nordby thought he’d be outmatched.

“It’s really stressed me out,” he said.

His parents will help pay some of the higher rent, he said, while he hunts for a second job.

about the writer

about the writer

Josie Albertson-Grove

Reporter

Josie Albertson-Grove covers politics and government for the Star Tribune.

See Moreicon

More from St. Paul

JIM GEHRZ • jgehrz@startribune.com Minneapolis, MN/January 23, 2007/2:00PM As part of the new Gopher stadium package, lawmakers have mandated that the U of M and the city study the impact on adjacent neighborhoods, which include some single family homes that have been converted to multi-unit dwellings that are rented predominantly by students. The for rent sign is posted in front of a home in the 1400 block of SE 7th St. // housing, houses, neighborhoods, rent, rental, apartme

All buildings opened since 2005 are exempt forever following a City Council vote, and tenants in some older buildings are also facing rent hikes.

card image
card image
OSZAR »